Rarebook
aShTA~ggahRudaya or vAhaTa with hRudayabodhikA TikA
Introductory
| S.NO : | 1134 | AMAR ID : | AMAR/RB/1134 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACCESSION NO. AT SOURCE : | 1966 | PHYSICAL LOCATION : | Vaidyaratnam P. S. Varier Ayurveda College, Kottakkal, P.O. Edarikode, District Malappuram, Kerala 676501. |
Technical
| TITLE OF THE RARE BOOK : | aShTA~ggahRudaya or vAhaTa with hRudayabodhikA TikA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHOR OF THE BOOK : | vAgBaTa | TIME OF AUTHOR: | INA |
| EDITED BY : | K. Raaghavan pillai | TRANSLATED BY : | INA |
| COMMENTARY BY: | श्रीदासपण्डित / Śrīdāsapaṇḍita | NAME OF COMMENTARY : | हृदयबोधिका टिका / Hr̥dayabōdhikā ṭikā |
| FOREWORD BY : | INA | AYUSH SYSTEM : | Ayurveda |
| SUBJECT : | अष्टाङ्गायुर्वेद / Aṣṭāṅgāyurvēda | LANGUAGE : | Sanskrit |
| SCRIPT: | Devanagari | PLACE & STATE : | INA |
PUBLISHER
| PUBLISHER DETAILS : | S. P. V. Press | YEAR OF PUBLICATION : | 1962 |
|---|---|---|---|
| NO OF PAGES : | 562 | ||
| ABOUT THE BOOK : | Hrudayabodhika was written on the entire Ashatangahrudaya Samhita by Shridasapandita. It reflects the vagbhata interpretations that were in vogue in Kerala. Numerous predecessors from that region are quoted, and it frequently provides the Malayalam equivalents of scientific terminology and plant names. Indu, Arunadatta, Hataka, and the authors of the Hṛdya, Pāthya, and (Vyakhyā)sāra are some of the earlier commentators who have been heavily mentioned. But Candranandana is utterly disregarded. Śrīdasa owes a great obligation to Arunadatta, whose opinions are frequently taken verbatim and inserted into the Hdayabodhika without attribution. The extensive discussion of the tantrayuktis by Aruna is replicated at the start of Rdasa's commentary, demonstrating the value he placed on the topic. The text of Arunadatta's Sarvangasundara differs from the text in the Hrudayabodhik in various printed editions. For instance, Śrīdasa cites a number of verses by Aruna or those he quotes that are not icluded in the versions. Aruna's interpretations are occasionally disregarded. However, Aruna is typically spoken to with respect. The same is true of Indu, with whom rdsa occasionally agrees and frequently disagrees. Śrīdasa expresses his own views several times while referring to himself as Pandita. These citations demonstrate that he had his own perspective on illnesses falling within the category of agantu and did not always agree with the Hrudaya's author. He speaks of what his teacher more frequently. Vasudeva pondered a particular issue. This instructor made his own determinations regarding the validity of specific readings and interpretations. The Hrdayabodhik's worth is enhanced by the numerous quotes from prior writers and works. Shridasapandita dates from the early fourteenth century. | ANY OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION : | |
Digitization Status
| DIGITIZED BY : | CCRAS-NIIMH | DIGITIZATION DATE : | 9/23/2022 |
|---|